What would the world be like if total and fully integrated honesty led everything in it, and I mean it? I ask myself that question all the time and I want to give some of my answers to that question here. Not only that, but I provide some understanding and epistemological reasoning for my answers in plain language. Read on: First of all, everyone would know where they stood in the world and life would not become a sales pitch for survival. Especially the standard of “survival of the fittest male soccer player through the gladiator as biased media thinking” that is happening now. It would be the rule of the wisest and of those who really get the best results. It would be a genuine democracy that is truly fair to the best people who get the best results for all through their genuine efforts. In short, people would genuinely and creatively think for themselves.

I know, even that honest life scenario seems far away. However, is it?

I say: when people get sick enough of the current “survival of the fittest male soccer player through the gladiator as thinking biased media” who lives, and reaches his final destination, things will change as well, I get it.

I mean, when people prepare to have a winning existence and are honest with themselves, the honesty will be there. That is my point. The current dishonesty is the counterpoint that exists now against what I am writing and speaking. In fact, I’ll go so far as to say that this is the training ground for that kind of future honesty, really.

However, as I said, like everything else, what is currently happening has to run its course and then completely change for the better, to put my understanding in the simplest English that I can express. No one can genuinely act beyond their understanding and change does not happen overnight. However, when it does, it does so quickly, terminally and permanently for the better, in the same way that electric light bulbs replaced candles, or motorized cars or trucks replaced horses or work animals. It all starts with the honesty of adaptation and the progression of genuine growth. We all have a choice to survive or not, but when change like this occurs, genuine regression is not an option. You may or may not agree with me, but birds never actually fly backwards, only in the movie do we take them flying backwards to finish with a logical metaphor. There is a genuine and consensual principle of honesty. There is no principle of dishonesty, except when laws are broken and values ​​are destroyed. That is what is meant by the metaphor “birds do not fly backwards in nature.”